Output
OutputMODE Tool: Output
The output of MODE typically consists of 4 files: 2 ASCII statistics files, 1 NetCDF object file, and 1 PostScript summary plot. The output of any of these files may be disabled using the appropriate MODE command line argument. In this example, the output is written to the current mode directory, as we requested on the command line.
The MODE output file naming convention is similar to that of the other MET tools. It contains timing information about the forecast being evaluated (forecast valid, lead, and accumulation times).
The 4 MODE output files are described briefly below:
- The PostScript file ends in .ps and is described below.
- The NetCDF object file ends in _obj.nc and contains the object indices.
- The ASCII contingency table statistics file and ends in _cts.txt.
- The ASCII object statistics file ends in _obj.txt and contains all of the object and object comparison data.
-
Page 1 summarizes the entire MODE run. Thumbnail images show the input data, resolved objects, and numbers identifying each object for both the forecast and observation fields. The color indicates object matching between the forecast and observation fields. Royal blue indicates an unmatched object. The object definition information is listed at the bottom of the page, and a sorted list of total object interest is listed on the right side.
- Page 2 is an expanded view of the forecast thumbnail images.
- Page 3 is an expanded view of the observation thumbnail images.
- Page 4 has images showing the forecast objects with observation object outlines overlaid, and vice-versa.
- Page 5 shows images and statistics for matching object clusters (i.e. one or more forecast objects matching one or more observation objects). These statistics also appear in the ASCII output from MODE.
- When double-thresholding or fuzzy engine merging is enabled, additional PostScript pages are added to illustrate those methods.
What are the benefits of spatial methods over traditional statistics? The weaknesses? What are some examples where an object-based verification would be inappropriate?